Services

In-depth security reviews conducted by experienced researchers. Coverage spanning pre-audit readiness, the review itself, and continuous work after launch.

How I work with you

Engagement 1

Readiness Review

A senior check of whether your codebase is ready for a full review, and what that review should scope to. You get a defensible scope before you commit budget, and your audit hours go to finding bugs rather than to gaps a reviewer shouldn't be discovering on day one. For teams preparing for an audit.

Scope and pricing
Scope
Test suite, invariants, architecture, scope readiness, documentation, and a threat model.
Deliverable
Written readiness report with prioritized, actionable recommendations.
Benefits
Credited in full toward a founder-led audit booked within 60 days of report delivery.
Timeline
1 - 5 working days.
Price
From $1,500, depending on scope.
Not included
In-depth economic analysis, comprehensive vulnerability assessment, fuzzing, or formal verification.

This tells you what to fix before a deeper review, at a fraction of the cost.

Engagement 2

Founder-Led Audit

A deep manual review led by Joe Stakey. I combine automated tooling with the adversarial reasoning and whitehat instinct that uncovered bugs in protocols already audited by top-tier firms. Every confirmed finding ships with a working proof of concept, so the fix is easy to verify.

Scoped to your full protocol, or focused on a single high-risk module.

Scope and pricing
Scope
Full protocol, or one critical module. Includes threat modeling and architecture review for pre-launch engagements.
Deliverable
Severity-rated findings report, each finding with a working PoC and clear remediation guidance. Fix verification on remediated findings included.
Timeline
Confirmed at scoping. Typical timelines:
  • Full protocol: 2-8 weeks.
  • Single module: 1-2 weeks.
Price
Scoped per engagement, based on codebase size, complexity, and timeline. For larger or higher-risk scopes, a second senior reviewer provides independent, four-eyes coverage.

Best for pre-launch protocols, major module rewrites, and teams who want the review done by the person whose name is on it.

Engagement 3

Continuous Retainer

Protocols that ship continuously cannot realistically audit every release. The conventional alternative, annual audits from rotating teams, leaves months of unaudited code in production and forces reviewers to re-learn your protocol every time.

A retainer gives you ongoing senior review against a codebase. The reviewer who reads your code today is the same reviewer six months from now.

Scope and pricing
Scope
Diff and PR review against the audited codebase, architecture consultation on new features, security advisory. Includes a first-month onboarding deep-dive: protocol architecture, threat model, prior audit findings review, and identification of the highest-risk surfaces.
Deliverable
Continuous PR review with SLA:
  • Priority: review begins within 4 business hours
  • Standard: review begins within 1 business day
Direct Telegram or Slack channel.
Benefits
Priority scheduling on other engagements. 20% discount on a full audit.
Timeline
Continuous. Month-to-month, 30 days' notice, minimum initial term 3 months. Unused capacity rolls up to 4 months.
Price
From $1,500 per month, scoped to capacity.
Not included
Full security audits of major new modules and incident response beyond initial triage. Each scoped separately.

Best for live protocols shipping every few weeks, post-launch teams between major audits, and protocols wanting continuous senior security coverage alongside periodic large-firm audits.

What I bring to a review

Adversarial track record. Top-ranked Immunefi whitehat, with Critical findings against live protocols.

Broad protocol exposure. Lending, vaults, AMMs, perps, bridges, staking, cross-chain systems and infrastructure.

Reusable exploit research. A private catalog of exploit patterns built from real-world incidents and prior research. See a snippet here

How a Founder-Led Audit runs

  1. First contact and scoping

    We walk the codebase and timeline together. I ask what you're building, your goals, what deadlines you're working against. If it's a fit, we move to a signed NDA and I look at the code in scope.

  2. Quote

    Based on scope, complexity, and timeline, I send a proposal with fixed price and dates.

  3. Kickoff

    The review begins. Proof of Concepts are developed for confirmed issues and findings are filed live in a private repo shared with you.

  4. Draft report

    You receive a report with the findings and recommended mitigation steps.

  5. Fix period

    Your team remediates and I'm available for questions.

  6. Fix verification

    I review the fixes, confirm they hold, and check for regressions or partial mitigations.

  7. Final report

    Delivered in your preferred format. Published only with your explicit consent.

Want to discuss a project?